From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20282-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29441 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2004 04:49:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29366 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2004 04:49:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2004 04:49:17 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.143.171])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR)
	with ESMTP id DGE32031 (AUTH halo1);
	Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:49:13 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 04:49:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <01c4d829$Blat.v2.2.2$f63454e0@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <41AE24AB.4050702@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 01
	Dec 2004 15:08:11 -0500)
Subject: Re: 6.3.50.2004-11-31 instead of 6.3.50_20041131; Was: Changes to snapshot
 directory
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <4188F500.4060205@gnu.org> <41AE24AB.4050702@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:08:11 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
> I've attached an attempt at revising the doco to reflect this.
> 
> comments?

Okay with me, except for this nit:

> ! 6.1.50.20020302,@* 6.1.90.20020304, or 6.1.0.20020308)
> ! @item @var{major}.@var{minor}.@var{patchlevel}.@var{YYYY}@var{MM}@var{DD}-cvs
> ! a @sc{cvs} check out drawn on @var{YYYY}-@var{MM}-@var{DD} (e.g.,
> ! 6.1.50.20020302-cvs,@* 6.1.90.20020304-cvs, or 6.1.0.20020308-cvs)

Why did you need to use @* here?