* Strange command in remote-mips.c
@ 2005-04-16 12:12 Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-18 16:00 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2005-04-16 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
The file remote-mips.c defines the following command:
add_com ("pmon <command>", class_obscure, pmon_command,
_("Send a packet to PMON (must be in debug mode)."));
Isn't this a bug? Shouldn't it say just "pmon" instead of
"pmon <command>"?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange command in remote-mips.c
2005-04-16 12:12 Strange command in remote-mips.c Eli Zaretskii
@ 2005-04-18 16:00 ` Kevin Buettner
2005-04-19 22:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-22 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2005-04-18 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:07:56 +0300
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> The file remote-mips.c defines the following command:
>
> add_com ("pmon <command>", class_obscure, pmon_command,
> _("Send a packet to PMON (must be in debug mode)."));
>
> Isn't this a bug? Shouldn't it say just "pmon" instead of
> "pmon <command>"?
It looks like a bug to me. It appears to me that there are three other
similar bugs:
./remote-st.c[799]: add_com ("st2000 <command>", class_obscure, st2000_command,
./remote-sim.c[894]: add_com ("sim <command>", class_obscure, simulator_command,
./remote-utils.c[607]: add_com ("remote <command>", class_obscure, sr_com,
./remote-mips.c[3419]: add_com ("pmon <command>", class_obscure, pmon_command,
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange command in remote-mips.c
2005-04-18 16:00 ` Kevin Buettner
@ 2005-04-19 22:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-22 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2005-04-19 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Buettner; +Cc: gdb
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:00:37 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
>
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:07:56 +0300
> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > add_com ("pmon <command>", class_obscure, pmon_command,
> > _("Send a packet to PMON (must be in debug mode)."));
> >
> > Isn't this a bug? Shouldn't it say just "pmon" instead of
> > "pmon <command>"?
>
> It looks like a bug to me.
Thanks for the feedback. I will fix this soon, unless someone beats
me to it.
> It appears to me that there are three other similar bugs:
Yes, I found them as well shortly after posting the question about
"pmon".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange command in remote-mips.c
2005-04-18 16:00 ` Kevin Buettner
2005-04-19 22:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2005-04-22 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2005-04-22 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Buettner; +Cc: gdb
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:00:37 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
>
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:07:56 +0300
> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > The file remote-mips.c defines the following command:
> >
> > add_com ("pmon <command>", class_obscure, pmon_command,
> > _("Send a packet to PMON (must be in debug mode)."));
> >
> > Isn't this a bug? Shouldn't it say just "pmon" instead of
> > "pmon <command>"?
>
> It looks like a bug to me. It appears to me that there are three other
> similar bugs:
I fixed them all now. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-22 12:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-16 12:12 Strange command in remote-mips.c Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-18 16:00 ` Kevin Buettner
2005-04-19 22:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-22 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).