public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb@sourceware.org, cagney@gnu.org
Subject: Re: A case for `void *' for pointers to arbitrary (byte) buffers
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 20:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c550e8$Blat.v2.4$9cadd580@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505041439.j44EddSb000734@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message from Mark Kettenis on Wed, 4 May 2005 16:39:39 +0200 (CEST))

> Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 16:39:39 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> CC: gdb@sourceware.org, cagney@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org
> 
> So there seems to be a concensus for using `gdb_byte' for target byte
> buffers.  Unless Eli has anything to add to the discussion, I'll
> consider this discussion closed.

I'm happy with gdb_byte; after all, it was my suggestion to begin
with.  I thought that your idea of void * was better, but if everyone
else is for gdb_byte, let's go with that.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-04 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <42710E90.3030300@gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <200504281919.j3SJJKF1011501@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
     [not found]   ` <42715EE8.5070704@gnu.org>
     [not found]     ` <01c54c8a$Blat.v2.4$ffbe8140@zahav.net.il>
     [not found]       ` <42753958.70109@gnu.org>
     [not found]         ` <01c54e92$Blat.v2.4$5cf24460@zahav.net.il>
     [not found]           ` <42755FD4.8000009@gnu.org>
     [not found]             ` <01c54f4a$Blat.v2.4$a9fc8500@zahav.net.il>
     [not found]               ` <42778DE6.1080106@gnu.org>
2005-05-03 20:17                 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-05-03 20:23                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 21:14                     ` Mark Kettenis
2005-05-03 21:16                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 22:10                         ` Mark Kettenis
2005-05-03 22:28                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 22:31                             ` Joel Brobecker
2005-05-04 14:45                             ` Mark Kettenis
2005-05-04 20:36                               ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-05-04 15:40                       ` Andrew Cagney
2005-05-04 17:57                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 22:01                   ` Stan Shebs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01c550e8$Blat.v2.4$9cadd580@zahav.net.il' \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).