From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21403-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30879 invoked by alias); 4 May 2005 20:36:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30823 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 20:35:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 20:35:58 -0000
Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-9-69.inter.net.il [80.230.9.69])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id EHI22614 (AUTH halo1);
	Wed, 4 May 2005 23:35:20 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 20:36:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <01c550e8$Blat.v2.4$9cadd580@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: drow@false.org, gdb@sourceware.org, cagney@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <200505041439.j44EddSb000734@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message
	from Mark Kettenis on Wed, 4 May 2005 16:39:39 +0200 (CEST))
Subject: Re: A case for `void *' for pointers to arbitrary (byte) buffers
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <42753958.70109@gnu.org> <01c54e92$Blat.v2.4$5cf24460@zahav.net.il> <42755FD4.8000009@gnu.org> <01c54f4a$Blat.v2.4$a9fc8500@zahav.net.il> <42778DE6.1080106@gnu.org> <200505032013.j43KD1dD005239@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050503202352.GA6424@nevyn.them.org> <200505032113.j43LDOlL013376@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050503211646.GB8203@nevyn.them.org> <200505032206.j43M6QEN002791@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050503222744.GA10500@nevyn.them.org> <200505041439.j44EddSb000734@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 16:39:39 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> CC: gdb@sourceware.org, cagney@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org
> 
> So there seems to be a concensus for using `gdb_byte' for target byte
> buffers.  Unless Eli has anything to add to the discussion, I'll
> consider this discussion closed.

I'm happy with gdb_byte; after all, it was my suggestion to begin
with.  I thought that your idea of void * was better, but if everyone
else is for gdb_byte, let's go with that.

Thanks.