From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21562-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29492 invoked by alias); 20 May 2005 14:34:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29450 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 14:34:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 May 2005 14:34:13 -0000
Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-247-87.inter.net.il [83.130.247.87])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id BGY84691 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 20 May 2005 17:33:58 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:34:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@virtutech.com>, dan@shearer.org
Message-ID: <01c55d48$Blat.v2.4$a15ecbe0@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050520131348.GB25206@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Fri, 20 May 2005 09:13:48 -0400)
Subject: Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20050519012254.GZ19642@erizo.shearer.org> <428C8E04.3000305@virtutech.com> <01c55d27$Blat.v2.4$69471120@zahav.net.il> <20050520131348.GB25206@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:13:48 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@virtutech.com>, dan@shearer.org,
> 	gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > > +  add_com ("rnext", class_run, rnext_command,
> > > +           "Step program until it reaches the previous source line.\n\
> > 
> > "Go backwards until the program reaches the source line before the
> > current one."
> 
> Johan used previous, you used backwards; let's figure out what we're
> calling the commands first :-P

There's no connection between the doc strings and the discussion about
the command names.  I didn't use "backwards" instead of "previous", I
used it instead of "Step program".  That's because "step intil you
reach the previous source line" does not say explicitly enough that we
go backwards.