public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: "Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: (remote) hellishly slow single stepping over library calls
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <071001c31bd8$841db090$0202040a@catdog> (raw)

When debugging using our QNX pdebug remote protocol and single stepping over
a library call like printf, it takes a LOOOONG time.  I'm talking like two
or three minutes.  A 'next' is fine but looking at the output of running our
pdebug server in verbose mode, gdb is doing step, step, step, all the way
through the whole library call.  Every single step results in fetching
registers and there is a huge amount of wire traffic generated.

This didn't happen with older (ie 5.0) gdbs which didn't seem to know how to
single step through our shared lib code but now that it does, this is pretty
painful.  Obviously it makes more sense to 'next' over a library call,
especially if you don't want to go into it but the question is, can anyone
think of a way to optimize this?  I though of putting in a hack like:

if (reg == PC_REGNUM)
    only_get_pc();

to avoid fetching the whole regset but it probably won't make that much
difference since there's still a packet over the wire each time and most
regsets fit in one packet anyway.

Would this problem also exist with the normal remote protocol?  (stupid
users...clicking step instead of next....;-)

cheers,

Kris

             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-16 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-16 18:25 Kris Warkentin [this message]
2003-05-16 18:50 ` Theodore A. Roth
2003-05-16 18:57   ` Kris Warkentin
2003-05-16 19:15 ` Quality Quorum
2003-05-16 19:24   ` Kris Warkentin
2003-05-16 19:29     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-16 20:04       ` Kris Warkentin
2003-05-16 23:10         ` Quality Quorum
2003-05-17  3:39       ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='071001c31bd8$841db090$0202040a@catdog' \
    --to=kewarken@qnx.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).