在 2020/8/13 上午2:40, David Blaikie 写道:
> 
> Then use of `auto*` would make it easier for you to spot use of plain
> pointers in your projects & scrutinize them further?
> 

My point is that `auto*` conveys no more information than `auto`. The absence of `*` does not imply the object (pointer)
being declared can never be null (apologies for this triple negation), so it complexifies coding rules and probably should
not be used at all.


-- 
Best regards,
LH_Mouse