From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Proposal: convert function definitions to prototyped form
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 08:16:00 -0000
Message-id: <1000602151553.ZM30578@ocotillo.lan>
References: <1000602075018.ZM29997@ocotillo.lan> <200006021226.e52CQ2I01239@delius.kettenis.local> <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2000-06/msg00016.html

On Jun 2,  2:26pm, Mark Kettenis wrote:

>    Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:50:19 -0700
>    From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
> 
>    Comma separated list with differing number of stars on the parameter
>    names (sparc-tdep.c):
> 
>     static branch_type
>    -isbranch (instruction, addr, target)
>    -     long instruction;
>    -     CORE_ADDR addr, *target;
>    +isbranch (long instruction, CORE_ADDR addr, CORE_ADDR * target)
>     {
> 
> I guess you should tweak it some more such that it outputs
> 
>    CORE_ADDR *target
> 
> instead of
> 
>    CORE_ADDR * target
> 
> (note the spurious space between * and target).

I noticed that.  The space was put there by ``indent''.  I would very
much like to get rid of that space and it would be easy to make the
perl script postprocess the ``indent'' output.  But in doing so, we
(obviously) generate different output than that of ``indent''.

I suppose the other solution is to fix indent.  :-)

FYI, I'm using GNU indent 2.2.5.

Kevin