From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18946 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2003 23:31:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18939 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2003 23:31:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2003 23:31:58 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9VNVwM22323 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:31:58 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9VNVv608319; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:31:57 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-2.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.2]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9VNVuju024742; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:31:56 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h9VNVpm04664; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:31:51 -0700 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:31:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031031233150.ZM4663@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Mark Kettenis "lin-lwp.c and UltraSPARC" (Oct 31, 9:38pm) References: <200310312038.h9VKc88W000928@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> To: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: lin-lwp.c and UltraSPARC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 On Oct 31, 9:38pm, Mark Kettenis wrote: > I'm also thinking about replacing the PTRACE_PEEKUSER with a > PTRACE_PEEKDATA since the latter should be implemented on all > architectures. In that case the call would probably fail the same way > on all architectures (assuming that nothing is mapped at address 0 on > all those architectures). This sounds like a good idea. Kevin