ser-tcp ser-unix question

ser-tcp ser-unix question

[msarasa]

We're trying to make a new file to define how should gdb connect to a 
simulated UART, as I said before. Forget the other question.
I see that there are three files called ser-tcp.c , ser-unix.c , ser-pipe.c , 
and also a pair called ser-something.c.
In configure.in from gdb there's a point in which SER_HARDWIRE = "ser-unix.c 
ser-tcp.c ser-pipe.c" is shown. But, I'm trying to configure this (just for a 
probe) with SER_HARDWIRE = "ser-unix.o ser-tcp.o ser-pipe.o ser-simuart.o" 
with no results.

I would like to do a new ser-simuart.c file , with all the methods to 
send-receive data to a simulated uart. So I could connect easily gdb to a 
software board simulator that reads/writes to a simulated UART. Before I make 
this ser-simuart.c file, how should I integrate this with the rest of the gdb 
code? Should I do something more or just a new file?

Thank you very much.
Each answer is really wellcomed!

miguel


----- End forwarded message -----

Re: ser-tcp ser-unix question

[Andrew Cagney]

> We're trying to make a new file to define how should gdb connect to a 
> simulated UART, as I said before. Forget the other question.
> I see that there are three files called ser-tcp.c , ser-unix.c , ser-pipe.c , 
> and also a pair called ser-something.c.
> In configure.in from gdb there's a point in which SER_HARDWIRE = "ser-unix.c 
> ser-tcp.c ser-pipe.c" is shown. But, I'm trying to configure this (just for a 
> probe) with SER_HARDWIRE = "ser-unix.o ser-tcp.o ser-pipe.o ser-simuart.o" 
> with no results.
> 
> I would like to do a new ser-simuart.c file , with all the methods to 
> send-receive data to a simulated uart. So I could connect easily gdb to a 
> software board simulator that reads/writes to a simulated UART. Before I make 
> this ser-simuart.c file, how should I integrate this with the rest of the gdb 
> code? Should I do something more or just a new file?

Add the new file.  Modify the serial.c code so that it recognizes and 
selects the new device (you mentioned this in your previous e-mail).

Get an FSF assignment.

Andrew

Re: ser-tcp ser-unix question

[msarasa]

Quoting Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>:

> > We're trying to make a new file to define how should gdb connect to a 
> > simulated UART, as I said before. Forget the other question.
> > I see that there are three files called ser-tcp.c , ser-unix.c , ser-pipe.c
> , 
> > and also a pair called ser-something.c.
> > In configure.in from gdb there's a point in which SER_HARDWIRE =
> "ser-unix.c 
> > ser-tcp.c ser-pipe.c" is shown. But, I'm trying to configure this (just for
> a 
> > probe) with SER_HARDWIRE = "ser-unix.o ser-tcp.o ser-pipe.o ser-simuart.o"
> 
> > with no results.
> > 
> > I would like to do a new ser-simuart.c file , with all the methods to 
> > send-receive data to a simulated uart. So I could connect easily gdb to a 
> > software board simulator that reads/writes to a simulated UART. Before I
> make 
> > this ser-simuart.c file, how should I integrate this with the rest of the
> gdb 
> > code? Should I do something more or just a new file?
> 
> Add the new file.  Modify the serial.c code so that it recognizes and 
> selects the new device (you mentioned this in your previous e-mail).
> 
> Get an FSF assignment.
> 
> Andrew

thanks! 
When i've made this , what should I do to build the gnu tools with the new 
file? I've tried to add ser-sim.c to configure.in (which is my file) in the 
line : SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o" , but eventhough I 
wrote SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o ser-sim.o",and then 
runned configure the makefile remains unaltered at this point(ser-sim.o , 
nowhere, the other yes). What I'm doing wrong? These ser-* files seems a 
little bit strange to me, because they're not included in any other file, so I 
thought that the only relation with the rest of gnu comes by the configure 
file. 

Where could I get an FSF assignment?

Thanks again!
Miguel.

Re: ser-tcp ser-unix question

[msarasa]

Quoting Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>:

> > We're trying to make a new file to define how should gdb connect to a 
> > simulated UART, as I said before. Forget the other question.
> > I see that there are three files called ser-tcp.c , ser-unix.c , ser-pipe.c
> , 
> > and also a pair called ser-something.c.
> > In configure.in from gdb there's a point in which SER_HARDWIRE =
> "ser-unix.c 
> > ser-tcp.c ser-pipe.c" is shown. But, I'm trying to configure this (just for
> a 
> > probe) with SER_HARDWIRE = "ser-unix.o ser-tcp.o ser-pipe.o ser-simuart.o"
> 
> > with no results.
> > 
> > I would like to do a new ser-simuart.c file , with all the methods to 
> > send-receive data to a simulated uart. So I could connect easily gdb to a 
> > software board simulator that reads/writes to a simulated UART. Before I
> make 
> > this ser-simuart.c file, how should I integrate this with the rest of the
> gdb 
> > code? Should I do something more or just a new file?
> 
> Add the new file.  Modify the serial.c code so that it recognizes and 
> selects the new device (you mentioned this in your previous e-mail).
> 
> Get an FSF assignment.
> 
> Andrew

thanks! 
When i've made this , what should I do to build the gnu tools with the new 
file? I've tried to add ser-sim.c to configure.in (which is my file) in the 
line : SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o" , but eventhough I 
wrote SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o ser-sim.o",and then 
runned configure the makefile remains unaltered at this point(ser-sim.o , 
nowhere, the other yes). What I'm doing wrong? These ser-* files seems a 
little bit strange to me, because they're not included in any other file, so I 
thought that the only relation with the rest of gnu comes by the configure 
file. 

Where could I get an FSF assignment?

Thanks again!
Miguel.

Re: ser-tcp ser-unix question

[Andrew Cagney]

> When i've made this , what should I do to build the gnu tools with the new 
> file? I've tried to add ser-sim.c to configure.in (which is my file) in the 
> line : SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o" , but eventhough I 
> wrote SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o ser-sim.o",and then 
> runned configure the makefile remains unaltered at this point(ser-sim.o , 
> nowhere, the other yes). What I'm doing wrong? These ser-* files seems a 
> little bit strange to me, because they're not included in any other file, so I 
> thought that the only relation with the rest of gnu comes by the configure 
> file. 

That should be all you need.  Perhaphs you need an _initialize_ser_xxx() 
function to force linking of the file?

Andrew

Re: ser-tcp ser-unix question

[msarasa]

Quoting Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>:

> > When i've made this , what should I do to build the gnu tools with the new
> 
> > file? I've tried to add ser-sim.c to configure.in (which is my file) in the
> 
> > line : SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o" , but eventhough I
> 
> > wrote SER_HARDWIRE = " ser-tcp.o ser-unix.o ser-pipe.o ser-sim.o",and then
> 
> > runned configure the makefile remains unaltered at this point(ser-sim.o , 
> > nowhere, the other yes). What I'm doing wrong? These ser-* files seems a 
> > little bit strange to me, because they're not included in any other file,
> so I 
> > thought that the only relation with the rest of gnu comes by the configure
> 
> > file. 
> 
> That should be all you need.  Perhaphs you need an _initialize_ser_xxx() 
> function to force linking of the file?


Thanks for your help & support!!
I've made this , and I have just one more problem that is:

I've made a new ser-sim.c file, actually It seems like ser-pipe.c but with 
empty functions for open/close and a _initialize.... function which is a copy 
from _initialize_ser_pipe() but that use the new empty sim_open() and 
sim_close.
I've made the gdb to obtain a ser-sim.o file.
I've changed the configure.in file to add this file where the other ser-** 
are. I ran configure , and I've obtained no ser-sim.o entry in the Makefile, 
where the other ser-*.o are. Not yet in init.c. 
But, when I've changed manually Makefile and added the ser-sim.o file where 
the other files are, I've got the desired init.c file , with the 
_initialize_ser_sim() function in its code. 

What should I do to make this clean from configure??

Thanks for the form!  I'll fill it 
Best regards, Miguel.

Re: ser-tcp ser-unix question

[Andrew Cagney]

> 
> 
> Thanks for your help & support!!
> I've made this , and I have just one more problem that is:
> 
> I've made a new ser-sim.c file, actually It seems like ser-pipe.c but with 
> empty functions for open/close and a _initialize.... function which is a copy 
> from _initialize_ser_pipe() but that use the new empty sim_open() and 
> sim_close.
> I've made the gdb to obtain a ser-sim.o file.
> I've changed the configure.in file to add this file where the other ser-** 
> are. I ran configure , and I've obtained no ser-sim.o entry in the Makefile, 
> where the other ser-*.o are. Not yet in init.c. 
> But, when I've changed manually Makefile and added the ser-sim.o file where 
> the other files are, I've got the desired init.c file , with the 
> _initialize_ser_sim() function in its code. 
> 
> What should I do to make this clean from configure??

I don't know.  I suspect you just need to dig a little bit more.

Andrew


> Thanks for the form!  I'll fill it 
> Best regards, Miguel.
> 
> 
>