From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10041 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2003 06:42:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9939 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 06:42:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO doubledemon.codesourcery.com) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2003 06:42:34 -0000 Received: from doubledemon.codesourcery.com (doubledemon.codesourcery.com [127.0.0.1]) by doubledemon.codesourcery.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5A6gF9X009518; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:42:15 -0700 Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x From: Mark Mitchell To: Zack Weinberg Cc: Joe Buck , DJ Delorie , aoliva@redhat.com, cgf@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <873ciitunz.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> References: <87of17t2j4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> <200306092345.h59Nj3Tf021127@envy.delorie.com> <20030609173251.A20668@synopsys.com> <873ciitunz.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 06:42:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1055227336.9370.14.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 21:37, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Joe Buck writes: > > > > > Now, if the folks at CodeSourcery really don't care that you slap the Red > > Hat name on one more thing, I would withdraw my objection TEMPORARILY. > > But I'd really like for the projects that develop code that belongs to > > the FSF use neutral names. > > I personally do not care one bit what domain name the mailing lists > are attached to. CodeSourcery is agnostic with respect to the domain name used for the mailing list. [However, I do think it's odd that the FSF worked so hard to get GCC to come from gcc.gnu.org, but binutils and lots of other GNU stuff still comes from sources.redhat.com.] If someone wants to set up the list on another machine, go for it. CodeSourcery won't object if it's @gcc.gnu.org, @redhat.com, @microsoft.com, @sco.com, or anything else. Zack took proactive action to try to move towards solving an important problem. He set up a short-term list to try to involve people in an open discussion about what needed to be done. I'm disappointed that the responses are dealing with the domain name and not with the topic at hand. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com