public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Biggs <xyzzy@hotpop.com>
To: GDB list <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Binutils and GDB
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 10:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060253680.9735.28.camel@steve.softier.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030806125353.GA24354@nevyn.them.org>

On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:53, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:05:27PM +0300, Stephen Biggs wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> > 
> > I apologize for what will probably seem a hopelessly clueless and newbie
> > question, but I am stuck, so here goes:
> > 
> > I notice that the GDB source tree has a lot of what seems to be almost
> > identical code in common with the binutils source tree.  I have made
> > some changes to the binutils 2.14 source tree, specifically in the BFD
> > and opcodes directories that I wish to integrate into GDB.  How do I do
> > this with the minimum amount of effort?  Is there a way to tell the GDB
> > configure to not configure the GDB's bfd, rather use another already
> > built BFD library? How, if so?
> 
> No, GDB can't use the system BFD.  I recommend just applying the patch. 
> The directory is common to both projects, but gdb and binutils branch
> at different times.
> 
But, this is a big mess, no?  That means that any changes in the system
binutils BFD have to be reflected in the GDB BFD and back-patched, which
they seem NOT to be... how does this work at all?

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-07 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-06 12:05 Stephen Biggs
2003-08-06 12:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-07 10:54   ` Stephen Biggs [this message]
2003-08-07 13:52     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-10  9:36       ` Stephen Biggs
2003-08-13 23:53         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-14 10:04           ` Stephen Biggs
2003-08-14 14:20             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-17  7:48               ` Stephen Biggs
2003-08-17 14:21                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1060253680.9735.28.camel@steve.softier.local \
    --to=xyzzy@hotpop.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).