From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20834-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9179 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2005 20:17:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9162 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2005 20:17:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (68.164.203.246)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2005 20:17:06 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO localhost)
  by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8)
  with ESMTP id 7760228; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:17:06 -0500
Subject: Re: patch review time
From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>, rjshaw@netspace.net.au, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <01c5227d$Blat.v2.4$27e1e820@zahav.net.il>
References: <16938.5992.336181.640228@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	 <20050305220619.GA4481@white> <422A4B04.40507@netspace.net.au>
	 <20050306134803.GC5776@white>  <01c5227d$Blat.v2.4$27e1e820@zahav.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:17:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1110140215.7544.11.camel@linux.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2

On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 20:47 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:48:04 -0500
> > From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> > 
> > and for some reason, no one else in this community bothers to stand up
> > for what should be right. 
> 
> I think this is a gross misrepresentation of the reality, to say the
> least.  You can find lots of evidence to the contrary in the archives.
> 
Yes.
In fact, you'll find this fight has been fought for years. :)