public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Craig Jeffree <craig.jeffree@preston.net>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: <incomplete type>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 05:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126761070.25254.325.camel@norman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050912013403.GA10666@nevyn.them.org>

On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 21:34 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Here's what I think is happening.
> 
> There's considerable code in GDB to guess the namespace of a structure
> when this problem is encountered.  But that code relies upon the
> mangled names of member functions of the type.  Probably it is
> successfully triggering for the _definition_ of the type, but in some
> other compilation unit (the one with the reference that shows up as
> incomplete), the DIE containing the declaration of Soi::Waypoint
> doesn't have enough information.  So the best GDB can come up with is
> "Waypoint".  Then it looks, and doesn't find Waypoint - the only
> definition was Soi::Waypoint, with a namespace qualifier.  So, no
> match.

Thanks for looking at this for me Daniel.  I assume the easiest way to
check if this hypothesis is correct would be for me to track down the
patch you mention below so I will go away and do that.

> 
> There's just nothing GDB can do, if that's what's happening.  You may
> be able to find a GCC patch in the archives of gcc-patches or
> gdb-patches to add DW_AT_namespace support to GCC 3.2.3, if rebuilding
> the compiler is an option.  Otherwise you're stuck until you upgrade
> GCC.
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-15  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-26  2:06 Craig Jeffree
2005-08-26 19:04 ` Jim Blandy
2005-08-29  7:50   ` Craig Jeffree
2005-08-29 18:38     ` Jim Blandy
2005-09-01 23:55       ` Craig Jeffree
2005-09-02  0:22         ` Jim Blandy
2005-09-02  1:50           ` Craig Jeffree
2005-09-02 13:16             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-05  7:34               ` Craig Jeffree
2005-09-05 14:00                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-06  7:15                   ` Craig Jeffree
2005-09-12  1:34                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-15  5:12                       ` Craig Jeffree [this message]
2005-09-19  7:44                         ` Craig Jeffree
2005-09-12  1:35           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-02  2:05       ` Craig Jeffree
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-01 21:21 "Incomplete Type" lin q

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1126761070.25254.325.camel@norman \
    --to=craig.jeffree@preston.net \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).