From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3419 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2007 22:14:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3411 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2007 22:14:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 216-129-118-140.cust.layer42.net (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (216.129.118.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:13:56 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [216.129.118.140]) by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D17C3B942; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Should we install gcore.sh (and a gcore.1 man page)? From: Michael Snyder To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Nicolas Bonifas In-Reply-To: <20071024221008.GM11797@adacore.com> References: <1193262980.16917.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071024221008.GM11797@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1193263756.16917.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 15:10 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Should we? Should we go ahead and put it into $/bin? > > In which case we might want to accept the contributed man page > > and install that as well? > > I think it's a useful script to install. My only concern is that > not all configurations support the gcore command... Configure?