From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
gdb@sourceware.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193363530.7018.42.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471FAC48.1070008@avtrex.com>
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 13:34 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> First of all I have never used a similar configuration so this may be
> totally off base. But...
>
> If the icache is virtually indexed, then I think there are only two
> ways
> to invalidate it. The first is from the context of the debugged
> process
> where the page is mapped at the location the target program will see
> it.
> If you try to invalidate from the context of the debugger, the
> page
> will most likely not be mapped at the virtual address of the target
> program so you might have to invalidate the *entire* icache.
Yup, sounds likely. We don't handle that virtual icache well at all in
linux. Things tend to work by mere luck. I have various ideas to fix
that but haven't actually implemented them.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 19:46 Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 20:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:46 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 21:54 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:33 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:39 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:40 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26 1:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-24 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-26 1:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 20:41 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-27 1:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27 1:40 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-24 20:34 ` David Daney
2007-10-26 1:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-10-26 1:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 2:45 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26 3:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 14:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-27 1:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <1193470322.18243.63.camel@pasglop>
[not found] ` <20071029070824.72854629@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20071029151546.5af0e843@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1193690106.9928.32.camel@pasglop>
2007-10-29 21:19 ` [PATCH/RFC] powerpc: Pass PID argument to _tlbie (WAS: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405) Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193363530.7018.42.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ddaney@avtrex.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).