From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8551 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2007 14:32:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 8528 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2007 14:32:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:32:20 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A412A17F47B for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:29:35 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l9REWHZ82855112 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:32:17 -0200 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9REWH3P019491 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:32:17 -0300 Received: from [9.12.235.45] ([9.12.235.45]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9REWEsC019481; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:32:15 -0300 Subject: Re: Breakpoint in C++ class constructor is never reached From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Mark Kettenis Cc: drow@false.org, spiridenok@tut.by, gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1193410939.5787.157.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20071026115446.GA26327@caradoc.them.org> <20071026122115.GA28419@caradoc.them.org> <20071026143128.GA26407@caradoc.them.org> <200710261450.l9QEouxs026180@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1193410939.5787.157.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1193495532.5787.187.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:02 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:50 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:31:28 -0400 > > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > Oh dear. GCC requires GNU make, but GDB is not supposed to, I don't > > > think. This is a new problem. > > > > I regularly build GDB with OpenBSD make, so yes this is new (and I'd > > very much appreciate it if it got fixed). > > I will work on this ASAP. I just posted a patch to fix this. Sorry for the delay, it took me some time to determine if I had copyright assignment to contribute to GCC. I tested the change with NetBSD's make, so I think the GNUisms are gone. If this is not enough to fix your build problems, please let me know. I can send you off-list a regenerated configure script if you want to test the patch and don't have autoconf 2.59 handy. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center