From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9356 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2007 13:50:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 9321 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2007 13:50:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:47:49 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.109]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07992390303 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:41:04 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l9UDlcxo860304 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:47:39 -0200 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9UDlcT4002150 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:38 -0300 Received: from [9.18.202.22] ([9.18.202.22]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9UDlbsO002125; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:38 -0300 Subject: Re: Breakpoint in C++ class constructor is never reached From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Bobo , Mark Kettenis , gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20071030111912.GA14912@caradoc.them.org> References: <20071026115446.GA26327@caradoc.them.org> <20071026122115.GA28419@caradoc.them.org> <20071026143128.GA26407@caradoc.them.org> <200710261450.l9QEouxs026180@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1193410939.5787.157.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1193495532.5787.187.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071030111912.GA14912@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1193752057.5787.219.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 07:19 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:53:43AM +0200, Bobo wrote: > > Sorry i don't really know what "off-list a regenerated configure script" means > > and what i need to do with it to verify if the build problem is gone... > > > > Is there maybe a snapshot available with the latest changes of Thiago? > > (the latest snapshot version i can find on pub/gdb/snapshots/ is from 26 Oct > > 2007) > > Please look again. They are generated every day and I see today's > already there. The change hasn't been commited to GCC repo yet. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center