Re: Breakpoint in C++ class constructor is never reached

[Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>]

Hi,

It seems that Solaris' patch tool doesn't support the unified diff
format. I didn't know that, sorry about this problem.

I don't have write access to the GCC repo (which is where libdecnumber
is hosted), so I couldn't commit it by myself. But Janis just did. It
will appear in tomorrow's GDB snapshot.

If you don't want to wait until then, you can check out now from the CVS
repository by following the instructions here:

http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/

-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center


On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 10:10 +0200, Bobo wrote:
> Unfortunately i can not patch the attached file. I get the following:
> shell:patch -p1 < /tmp/remove-gnuism.diff
>    Looks like a unified context diff.
> File to patch:
> 
> Is it because my version of the patch tool does not match with the diff 
> version used to create the patch?
> 
> Anyway... Thiago, when are you planning to commit the patch so that i get it 
> with the latest snapshot?
> 
> Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:13:39 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The patch hasn't been commited yet, so it won't appear in the snapshot.
> > 
> > In the meantime, you can use the attached patch in a recent GDB snapshot
> > with these commands:
> > 
> > $ cd gdb-6.7.50.20071030
> > $ patch -p1 < /path/to/attached/remove-gnuism.diff
> > 
> > This should get you a GDB source code tree which will build in your
> > environment.
> > -- 
> > []'s
> > Thiago Jung Bauermann
> > Software Engineer
> > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 11:53 +0200, Bobo wrote:
> >> Sorry i don't really know what "off-list a regenerated configure script" 
> >> means and what i need to do with it to verify if the build problem is 
> >> gone...
> >> 
> >> Is there maybe a snapshot available with the latest changes of Thiago?
> >> (the latest snapshot version i can find on pub/gdb/snapshots/ is from 26 
> >>Oct 
> >> 2007)
> >> 
> >> Anyway, i would like to check if the build problem is solved. please let 
> >>me 
> >> know how i can do that.
> >> 
> >> Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:32:12 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann 
> >><bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> >> 
> >> > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:02 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:50 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> >> > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:31:28 -0400
> >> >> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> >> >> > > Oh dear.  GCC requires GNU make, but GDB is not supposed to, I 
> >>don't
> >> >> > > think.  This is a new problem.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > I regularly build GDB with OpenBSD make, so yes this is new (and I'd
> >> >> > very much appreciate it if it got fixed).
> >> >> 
> >> >> I will work on this ASAP.
> >> > 
> >> > I just posted a patch to fix this. Sorry for the delay, it took me some
> >> > time to determine if I had copyright assignment to contribute to GCC.
> >> > 
> >> > I tested the change with NetBSD's make, so I think the GNUisms are gone.
> >> > If this is not enough to fix your build problems, please let me know.
> >> > 
> >> > I can send you off-list a regenerated configure script if you want to
> >> > test the patch and don't have autoconf 2.59 handy.
> >> > -- 
> >> > []'s
> >> > Thiago Jung Bauermann
> >> > Software Engineer
> >> > IBM Linux Technology Center
>        
> 
> 
> ---------
> Акция 'Купи сухие строительные смеси САРМАТ и получи приз' продолжается! 
> Подробности на http://www.sarmat.by
>