From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4090 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2007 02:04:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 3992 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2007 02:04:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bluesmobile.specifix.com (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (216.129.118.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:04:46 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [216.129.118.140]) by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216F13C0EF; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:04:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Watchpoints with condition From: Michael Snyder To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200711301925.20196.vladimir@codesourcery.com> References: <200711301925.20196.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:04:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1196733050.2501.200.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 19:25 +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > GDB presently allow a watchpoint to have a condition, and I wonder > what are the use-cases for that. > > If anybody has used watchpoint in condition in practice when debugging > real problem (as opposed to just playing with gdb, or making up > possible uses), can he share why it was needed? May I ask, what prompts the question? Were you thinking of getting rid of it?