From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24565 invoked by alias); 21 May 2012 17:37:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 24313 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2012 17:37:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausxipps301.us.dell.com (HELO ausxipps301.us.dell.com) (143.166.148.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 May 2012 17:37:00 +0000 X-Loopcount0: from 10.175.216.251 From: To: CC: , , Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1271EA6F-A335-45D0-A509-4FD969DF0F69@dell.com> References: <20120330161403.GA17891@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87aa2rjkb8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F832D5B.9030308@redhat.com> <87ehqhfenc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4FBA6583.5000002@redhat.com> <20120521161456.GA5429@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20120521161456.GA5429@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 I'm working on a system where the boot device has about a megabyte free spa= ce, on a good day. paul On May 21, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2012 17:55:47 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: >> In my quick experiment adding a cout << "foo" (-static-libstdc++ -flto -= Os >> + strip) more than triples the binary size. >=20 > Could you give specific still used device example where the current codeb= ase > is OK while the triple gdbserver size is no longer OK? All the discussio= ns > are still very abstract. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Jan