From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11677 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2010 13:25:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 11650 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2010 13:25:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from etinternational-gw.customer.alter.net (HELO etinternational.com) (63.125.108.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:24:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.9.69] (random.xmen.eti [192.168.9.69]) (Authenticated sender: bheilig) by etinternational.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87BEBF00C9 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:24:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Porting gdb to Cyclops64 From: Brian Heilig To: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <201007310017.53475.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <1280510022.1560.20.camel@random> <4C5320B0.2070309@vmware.com> <1280521733.1560.44.camel@random> <201007310017.53475.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1280755494.1560.47.camel@random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 00:17 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Not sure what you mean --- the user would still have to resume each > thread individually. But yes, in non-stop mode, your target should > let the other threads that hadn't hit any breakpoint continue running > free. My understanding is that in non-stop mode I can "continue all", whereas in stop mode I can only continue the current thread. This would mean that, in stop mode, each thread would have to be continued in succession. Brian