From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29319 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 18:04:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 29310 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 18:04:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx0b-000f4101.pphosted.com (HELO mx0b-000f4101.pphosted.com) (67.231.152.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:04:38 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0000687 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-000f4101.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q3CI4K33025963; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:04:23 -0400 Received: from mta1.netezza.com (mta1.netezza.com [12.148.248.132]) by mx0b-000f4101.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 145j0jrhkm-13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:04:23 -0400 Received: from [172.29.90.126] (172.29.90.126) by owa1.netezza.com (172.29.50.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.436.0; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:04:19 -0400 Subject: Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... From: Paul Smith Reply-To: psmith@gnu.org To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20120412171750.GX25623@adacore.com> References: <20120412153301.GW25623@adacore.com> <1334248104.31651.79.camel@homebase> <20120412171750.GX25623@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1334253859.22831.20.camel@psmith-ubeta> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7498,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-04-12_05:2012-04-12,2012-04-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:17 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I am not opposed to this patch in principle, but a taking a look at > the patch would allow us to evaluate its impact. Can you repost or > send a link to that patch? Looks like it's already fixed in the trunk: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13861 > In the meantime, it seems much easier to just apply the patch locally > to your sources rather than wait for 7.4.1 or 7.5... Well, I thought of that but the patch is to configure.ac so after I applied it I would have to re-run autoconf to get a new configure script... the cure is worse than the disease!! :-)