From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22984 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 19:06:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22974 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 19:06:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 19:06:54 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3GJ6sD14812 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:06:54 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3GJ6rq15249 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:06:53 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3GJ6qg19008; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:06:52 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id B22CB2C43F; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:11:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16029.43737.556056.265671@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:06:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: testsuite errors on Red Hat 8.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20030416041146.GA2311@nevyn.them.org> <16029.26746.618459.649488@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:28:10 -0400, Elena Zannoni said: > > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:06:26PM -0700, David Carlton wrote: > > >> > I just updated GDB on my laptop for the first time in a while, and I'm > >> > seeing some new testsuite errors: in gdb.base/completion.exp, I get: > >> > > >> > FAIL: gdb.base/completion.exp: (timeout) complete 'info func mar' > >> > >> I think Elena posted a patch for this one that hasn't been applied yet? > > > No I haven't. Can you try it and see if it fixes the fail? > > Yeah, it does. (Well, it does after I deleted the files > 'completion.exp.patch' and 'completion.exp.orig' that I created in > gdb.base; too bad completion.exp is so sensitive to these things!) > Incidentally, should the test be renamed to > > completion 'info func marke' > > instead of > > completion 'info func mar' > Yes, good point, I missed that. I think this should be changed accordingly, otherwise it's hard to look at the PASS/FAIL and see which version of completion.exp one is using. > ? Or would that just annoy people doing regression testing? > > >> > FAIL: gdb.base/completion.exp: (timeout) complete 'set follow-fork-mode' > >> > >> Huh, not seen this one before. > > > wonder if this is just a cascade failure because of the timeouts. > > It was. > ahh good. > David Carlton > carlton@math.stanford.edu