public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>,
	Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: breakpoint commands and finish
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16031.4562.644834.479261@casey.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030417201909.GA2867@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > > rbreak (or ebreak).  I find I often was to place a breakpoint at the
 > > end of a function; it'd be nice if gdb could do that automaticly.
 > 
 > It's too darned hard :)  Debug info does not represent the exit point
 > of the function.  It's not always at the end; modern gcc's can emit
 > multiple exit edges, too.

And if a tail-call optimization has been done, it gets even harder.

OTOH, if one stops at the first instruction of a function,
presumably it'd then be easy to set a breakpoint at the return address.
I wonder if gdb's macro facility is sufficient to write a macro
that would make this almost user-friendly: it would set a
breakpoint at the start of the function (pre-prologue) then have
commands that first sets a tbreak breakpoint at the return address
and then continues.  You couldn't already be in the function of
course (but if you were presumably you'd use "finish").

?

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-17 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-14 20:56 Matt Thomas
2003-04-14 21:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-04-14 21:04   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-04-14 21:11     ` Doug Evans
2003-04-14 21:33       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-04-14 22:27         ` Doug Evans
2003-04-14 21:23     ` Matt Thomas
2003-04-17 17:47 ` Michael Snyder
2003-04-17 18:48   ` Matt Thomas
2003-04-17 20:19     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-17 20:44       ` Doug Evans [this message]
2003-04-17 20:50         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-17 21:19           ` Doug Evans
2003-04-17 21:44             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-17 23:11             ` return value of a gdb command Smita
2003-04-17 23:13               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-18 12:10                 ` Bob Rossi
2003-04-18 13:38                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-21 20:55                 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16031.4562.644834.479261@casey.transmeta.com \
    --to=dje@transmeta.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=matt@3am-software.com \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).