From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: drow@mvista.com
Cc: carlton@bactrian.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: breakpoints in constructors
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 22:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16040.24304.972922.825790@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030424145034.GA14226@nevyn.them.org>
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
Daniel> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:04:46PM -0700, David Carlton
Daniel> wrote:
>> I might have some time over the next few weeks (/months) to work
>> on the "breakpoints in constructors" issue. Daniel: clearly
>> you've thought about this already, so if you happen to have time
>> to do a bit of a brain dump on the issue at some point, I'd
>> appreciate it.
Daniel> Sure. First of all, a rough overview of the problem; might
Daniel> as well keep everything in one place.
Daniel> With the new GCC 3.x multi-vendor C++ ABI, constructors are
Daniel> implemented as multiple functions: C1, the complete object
Daniel> constructor [in-charge] C2, the base object constructor
Daniel> [not-in-charge] C3, the allocating constructor [not currently
Daniel> used]
Daniel> Similarly for destructors - most of the rest of this message
Daniel> applies to destructors too. The base constructor is
Daniel> generally called for the base objects of a derived class,
Daniel> esp. with virtual inheritance; it's been a while since I
Daniel> looked at exactly when.
Daniel> GCC has chosen to implement this by duplicating the function,
Daniel> including any user-provided code and any compiler-added code.
Daniel> A better implementation would have one copy and labels for
Daniel> multiple entry points, on systems where that is supported;
Daniel> that's temporarily tabled pending a better description of the
Daniel> GCC tree structure to describe multiple entry points.
Maybe this is off base, but Fortran has always had multiple entry
points, and GCC supports Fortran (g77), so presumably there is a way
to represent this in the tree structure already.
paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-24 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-18 20:04 David Carlton
2003-04-24 14:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-24 22:02 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2003-04-25 0:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-29 20:45 ` Paul Koning
2003-04-29 21:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-30 19:04 ` Michael Eager
2003-04-30 19:11 ` Paul Koning
2003-04-30 19:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-30 4:36 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-04-30 5:20 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-04-30 14:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-05-01 2:13 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-12-15 14:06 Breakpoints " Amit Kale
2005-12-26 7:52 ` Amit Kale
2005-12-27 4:07 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16040.24304.972922.825790@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com \
--to=pkoning@equallogic.com \
--cc=carlton@bactrian.org \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).