From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12603 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 15:44:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12565 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 15:44:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 15:44:00 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h49Fi0H24428 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 11:44:00 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h49Fi0I21413 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 11:44:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h49Fhv803791; Fri, 9 May 2003 11:43:57 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 9CB802C439; Fri, 9 May 2003 11:49:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16059.52718.465177.555337@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 15:44:00 -0000 To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz , Roland McGrath , Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: NPTL thread support In-Reply-To: <20030509075610.B1675@lucon.org> References: <200305090945.h499jTH13137@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20030509134135.GA20959@nevyn.them.org> <16059.47081.289185.757260@localhost.redhat.com> <20030509075610.B1675@lucon.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 H. J. Lu writes: > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:15:05AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > > > Which reminds me that we should probably have the NPTL thread support > > patches integrated in gdb as well, since we are at this (and I have > > your attention). Can somebody (Daniel, Mark?) take a look at the > > patches? I can guarentee that they work, since they were shipped with > > RHL9's gdb. > > > > Yes, please. I have to use gdb from cvs since the one RedHat 9 doesn't > work too well for me. But I lose the NPTL support. > > > H.J. yes, catch 22. RHL9's gdb is based from a snapshot of November 2002, it doesn't have a lot of the new fixes. elena