public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 6
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 22:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16061.32163.69181.411133@nick.uklinux.net> (raw)

> > What exactly do you mean here?
> > Annotations Level 2 will stay in gdb for version 6.0?
> > This would truly be a great thing.


> It won't have been deleted (but it would continue to be on notice).

Will GDB 6 have annotation level three? The patch that you posted (2003-03-11)
doesn't appear to have been applied yet.

I might have lost the plot a bit. I initially checked out interps-20030202-branch
but, after some difficulty, I moved to HEAD and found that things like 

-interpreter-exec console cli-command

 and 

interpreter mi -<mi-command> <mi-args>

were present there also. Am I in the right place?

In the past you have suggested that (in the fullness of time)

> The events [annotations] remain (target changed, breakpoint created, ....). 
> The markups are removed (*-{begin,end})

I've got my head round variable objects and think that they might map on to
alists and the Emacs speedbar quite well. This means I can avoid the
annotations that mark up displayed expressions. However, the proposed patch
also removed some event annotations e.g source, query. I would like these to
stay. Here is a revised and reduced list of annotations that I think I could
work with:

frames-invalid
breakpoints-invalid
pre-prompt
prompt
commands
overload-choice
query
prompt-for-continue
post-prompt
source
starting
exited
signalled
signal
breakpoint
watchpoint
frame-begin
stopped

Could these stay? (indefinitely?)

Nick

             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-10 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-10 22:35 Nick Roberts [this message]
2003-05-11 15:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-12 18:57   ` Nick Roberts
2003-05-11 22:00     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-12 19:29     ` Bob Rossi
2003-05-13 17:47       ` Nick Roberts
2003-05-12 19:36     ` Bob Rossi
2003-05-13 17:47       ` Nick Roberts
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-09 18:17 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-05-09 20:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-09 16:58 Andrew Cagney
2003-05-09 17:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-09 17:41   ` Elena Zannoni
2003-05-09 18:05 ` Bob Rossi
2003-05-09 20:21   ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16061.32163.69181.411133@nick.uklinux.net \
    --to=nick@nick.uklinux.net \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).