From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-13971-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20792 invoked by alias); 27 May 2003 15:06:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20745 invoked from network); 27 May 2003 15:06:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 May 2003 15:06:41 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4RF6fH01950
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 27 May 2003 11:06:41 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4RF6fI13545
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 27 May 2003 11:06:41 -0400
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:1Ff7QEGshwBVqwwrLFyEdQks+LlnMqw7@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4RF6eo08691;
	Tue, 27 May 2003 11:06:40 -0400
Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469)
	id 96AD72C43F; Tue, 27 May 2003 11:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16083.32844.434477.515378@localhost.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:06:00 -0000
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: DW_TAG_try_block
In-Reply-To: <20030527075736.A22991@lucon.org>
References: <20030526124443.A7502@lucon.org>
	<16083.31335.661805.9131@localhost.redhat.com>
	<20030527075736.A22991@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2

H. J. Lu writes:
 > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:47:03AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > > H. J. Lu writes:
 > >  > Intel C++ compiler generates DW_TAG_try_block for
 > >  > 
 > >  > 	try
 > >  > 	  {
 > >  > 	  ...
 > >  > 	  }
 > >  > 
 > >  > Gdb can't print any local variables declared inside the try block. This
 > >  > patch seems to work for us. Is that correct?
 > >  > 
 > >  > 
 > >  > H.J.
 > >  > ---
 > >  > 2003-05-26  H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
 > >  > 
 > >  > 	* dwarf2read.c (process_die): Handle DW_TAG_try_block.
 > >  > 
 > >  > --- gdb/dwarf2read.c.try	2003-05-26 12:23:22.000000000 -0700
 > >  > +++ gdb/dwarf2read.c	2003-05-26 12:37:08.000000000 -0700
 > >  > @@ -1768,6 +1768,7 @@ process_die (struct die_info *die, struc
 > >  >           of a function and make GDB `next' properly over inlined functions.  */
 > >  >        break;
 > >  >      case DW_TAG_lexical_block:
 > >  > +    case DW_TAG_try_block:
 > >  >        read_lexical_block_scope (die, objfile, cu_header);
 > >  >        break;
 > >  >      case DW_TAG_class_type:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Seems ok, can you address Daniel's concern about the catch block?
 > > I.e. add that as well? 
 > 
 > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-05/msg00348.html
 > 

oh, ok then.

 > > How about adding a little test case to the gdb.c++ directory?
 > > 
 > 
 > I can provide a simple C++ code. But you will need Intel C++ compiler to
 > see the problem. Also the current Intel compiler doesn't support RedHat
 > 9.
 > 

Hmm, maybe just post the example code then.

elena


 > 
 > H.J.