From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5308 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2003 21:28:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5165 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2003 21:28:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nick.uklinux.net) (194.247.51.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2003 21:28:34 -0000 Received: by nick.uklinux.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id E985E75FDE; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:23:14 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16108.58306.439789.179441@nick.uklinux.net> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:28:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Emacs section of Gdb Manual In-Reply-To: <3EEC6848.4030005@redhat.com> References: <16105.5179.107976.322438@nick.uklinux.net> <3EEBD9FF.4010609@redhat.com> <3942-Sun15Jun2003063622+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3EEC6848.4030005@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 > > However, if the GDB's Emacs section is good enough, chances are the > > Emacs manual will omit it altogether, and instead point to the GDB > > manual. I think the Emacs manual will need to keep its own section because some the description is generic: gud-next, gud-break etc are commands that apply to debuggers other than GDB. > I'm guessing, based on nick's post, that EMACS has grown an IDE and the > IDE section is including the basics of GDB from EMACS. For the moment, I'm only proposing very conservative changes to the GDB documentation to reflect the status of the current release of Emacs (21.3). The changes that I have made to the way Emacs interacts with GDB are still in CVS so I will not mention them. Nick