From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2929 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2003 13:52:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2850 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 13:52:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 13:52:46 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5GDqkH32052 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:52:46 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5GDqjI04402 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:52:45 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5GDqgI02681; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:52:43 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id E33322C43B; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:59:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16109.52534.183379.725367@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:52:00 -0000 To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6 branch, 21st June? In-Reply-To: References: <3EEA6240.4070401@redhat.com> <3EEDBA78.2030609@redhat.com> <20030616125110.GB16251@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00317.txt.bz2 Andreas Jaeger writes: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:39:20AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> >Andrew Cagney writes: > >> > > >> > > >> >>Still scheduled for 21st, how is that looking? > >> > > >> > > >> >We currently have the following results from make check on > >> >x86_64-linux-gnu: > >> > > >> > === gdb Summary === > >> > > >> ># of expected passes 8930 > >> ># of unexpected failures 100 > >> ># of unexpected successes 4 > >> ># of expected failures 46 > >> ># of known failures 23 > >> ># of unresolved testcases 3 > >> ># of untested testcases 6 > >> ># of unsupported tests 1 > >> >/usr/src/aj/build/gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version 2003-06-16-cvs > >> >-nx > >> > > >> > > >> >How does this look in comparison with other platforms? > >> > >> Pretty much on par. break main, run, next definitly works. > > > > i386-linux is down at around ten failures. Alpha's a bit higher, > > Ten failures sounds fine! > > > sparc's really rotten (thousands). > > I hope that even if we branch on the 21st, we have the possibility to > get fixes for those failures on x86_64 into the branch? Unfortunatly > Michal is on vacation until the 28th and cannot do anything himself - > and I'm also occupied :-( > > Andreas > -- > Andreas Jaeger > SuSE Labs aj@suse.de > private aj@arthur.inka.de > http://www.suse.de/~aj Usually we allow for a period of bugfixes/stabilization on the branch. Here are my results on RHL9: TODAY: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 8970 # of unexpected failures 98 # of unexpected successes 4 # of expected failures 46 # of known failures 22 # of unresolved testcases 3 # of unsupported tests 1 while on 6-6-2003 I was getting a few less failures: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 8868 # of unexpected failures 87 # of unexpected successes 4 # of expected failures 46 # of known failures 21 # of unresolved testcases 3 # of unsupported tests 1 here are the regressions/differences: +FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: until 79 +FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: break on default location, 2nd time +FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: break on default location, 3rd time +FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: break on default location, 4th time +Running /home/ezannoni/gdb-sources/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/fileio.exp ... +FAIL: gdb.base/fileio.exp: Renaming a directory to a non-empty directory returns ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST Running /home/ezannoni/gdb-sources/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/store.exp ... -FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 1 -FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 2 -FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 3 -FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 4 +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - char +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - short +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - int +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - long +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - longest +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - float +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - double +FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - doublest +FAIL: gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp: philosopher is distinct: 3 +FAIL: gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp: philosopher is distinct: 7