From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF7C3858D28 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:04:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7AF7C3858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 088331E110; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:04:54 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1674057895; bh=5I1IBRjGZubsTap/hsf3aSwL+MLHbrCCHJZ9xHi6A1Y=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=c/wCnO9gF2azT7SA3FEafsUz5n3bjZ5jx6sACkngU7qOX5BTqSeGQtqoGDb+0T+za 5WqN0XffB7TkCzSmtB0RTw4YfoJ+nUcMVwMd4MPJBGi4OlYevuSoWJjsEDllA1vYcA US3rfIBa3/pEIaUgWbXwF4B8TWFzwAOPl/KKxLhI= Message-ID: <164b7d9a-03a9-1256-56c5-48f1327bfe28@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:04:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: CI scripts Content-Language: en-US To: Jan Vrany , GDB mailing list References: <591347cb638e9fcbc15478691e13e9c0664e3537.camel@vrany.io> <29aa46326e96d373dff8c20d0ad5d9c948d05a7c.camel@vrany.io> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <29aa46326e96d373dff8c20d0ad5d9c948d05a7c.camel@vrany.io> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > After updating the repo from your fork to upstream I do see loads of failures > as well. Once fixed, it should get back to normal for me too. Almost! Before that I had these failures: FAIL: gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp: disassemble one instruction success FAIL: gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp: instructions in disassemble output They would be fixed by that series: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20230106185729.42372-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com/ And often some gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp internal errors. Since gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp is a new-ish test, I'd like to avoid marking it as "known fail", and actually fix the problem. The goal is for that list to shrink, not grow :). Simon