From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16019 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2003 04:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16010 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 04:19:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 04:19:30 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.234.17]) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id AHS61041; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:19:21 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 04:19:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@redhat.com Message-Id: <1659-Tue04Mar2003061505+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3E63E3D3.6070401@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:22:59 -0500) Subject: Re: [maint] Guidelines for experimental branches Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3E63E3D3.6070401@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:22:59 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > The attached is one bit of fallout from a recent discussion. It's a > proposed policy for branches. Fine with me. > +@item all commits shall be posted > +All changes committed to a branch shall also be posted to the > +@email{gdb-patches@@sources.redhat.com, the @value{GDBN} patches} > +mailing list. I think "mailing list" should also be inside @email.