From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29818 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2006 22:00:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 29808 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2006 22:00:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:00:12 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-112-253.snap.net.nz [202.124.112.253]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C1D7766C8; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:00:09 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 49ECD1D3547; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:58:54 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17596.2077.682837.126332@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:02:00 -0000 To: Jim Ingham Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, dmi-discuss@lists.freestandards.org Subject: Re: MI: event notification In-Reply-To: References: <17560.40409.61785.698765@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060621013437.GA17956@nevyn.them.org> <17560.44395.508930.351917@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060621023258.GA19167@nevyn.them.org> <0DEBAC0A-BF26-414A-ABE6-DFE5105A684C@apple.com> <17593.30235.462941.279388@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.37 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 > > In any case, we need to be scientific about it, so I propose to add a > > time field to the MI output. ISTR that Apple's MI already has this. Are > > you planning to include this (or the async notifications for shared > > librarys) in the DMI specification? I would like to avoid unnecessary > > duplication of effort. > > Dunno if the timing belongs in the spec, since it's more of a > diagnostic thing. But it is really handy to have... The shared > library notification is really useful and probably should go in. If timing is not part of the DMI spec, which sounds reasonable, then I think that should be documented too. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob