From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>
To: hjl@valinux.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unified watchpoints for x86 platforms
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 11:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200102101928.OAA01348@indy.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010210101837.A13630@valinux.com>
> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:18:37 -0800
> From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com>
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 10:33:52AM -0500, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > unsigned int HWBP_GET_STATUS (int pid);
> >
> > This macro returns the value of the DR6 debug status register from
> > the inferior.
> >
> > In the discussion we had back in September, Mark said that the
> > status register should be per thread. Does that mean that we need
> > an additional argument (int tid?) to pass to HWBP_GET_STATUS? If
> > so, how will this argument get into the i386_hwbp_* functions which
> > will call these macros?
>
> What is the difference between pid and tid in this case? Can we derive
> tid from pid?
That's what I'd like to know as well. Anyone?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-10 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-07 1:55 gdb doesn't work very well with dynamic linked binaries James Cownie
2000-09-07 3:09 ` Mark Kettenis
2000-09-07 8:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2000-09-08 8:30 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-10 7:34 ` [RFC] Unified watchpoints for x86 platforms Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-10 10:19 ` H . J . Lu
2001-02-10 11:28 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-02-15 3:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 8:17 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15 9:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15 13:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 10:41 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-15 13:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 14:46 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-15 16:11 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-15 23:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-24 10:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-27 3:28 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-27 10:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-21 15:59 ` [RFA] " Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 23:30 ` [RFC] " Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-16 10:52 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-16 0:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15 9:08 ` H . J . Lu
2000-09-09 14:39 ` gdb doesn't work very well with dynamic linked binaries Peter.Schauer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-06-02 8:40 Proposal: convert function definitions to prototyped form David Taylor
2000-06-02 12:10 ` Kevin Buettner
2000-06-03 3:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <eliz@delorie.com>
2000-06-03 10:50 ` Kevin Buettner
2000-06-03 11:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2000-06-03 18:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-06-03 15:42 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-16 0:45 ` [RFC] Unified watchpoints for x86 platforms Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200102101928.OAA01348@indy.delorie.com \
--to=eliz@delorie.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hjl@valinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).