From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] Re: _WIN32?
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 15:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010503185328.F7456@redhat.com>
References: <20010503211502.21716.qmail@web6401.mail.yahoo.com> <3AF1DAA0.3060702@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00057.html

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 06:24:32PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>For:
>
>> #ifndef _WIN32
>>   kill (PIDGET (inferior_pid), SIGINT);
>> #endif
>> 
>> would be replaced with something like this:
>> 
>> #ifndef _N0_KILL_
>> kill (PIDGET (inferior_pid), SIGINT);
>> #endif
>
>I'm actually puzzled.  It looks very like someone took a shortcut and, 
>instead of implementing new methods, just went through and commented out 
>every call to kill().  cf handle_sigio().
>
>Anyway, to answer your question:
>
>> You are proposing that something like this in inflow.c 
>
>Yes, for the most part I would like to strongly encouraging people doing 
>WIN32, GO32 and CYGWIN ports to look back over all those #ifdef's and 
>see if they are better served by an autoconf feature test. Per my 
>earlier e-mail, the obvious oneis to do with how file systems are DOS 
>file systems are handled and there, I think things are being replaced 
>with a runtime test.

FWIW, I strongly agree with this sentiment.  Host conditionals are evil.

Should this be a goal for 5.1?

cgf