From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21313 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2003 16:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21306 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 16:59:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 16:59:44 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h22Gxc908446; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:59:38 -0600 Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 16:59:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200303021659.h22Gxc908446@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, stcarrez@nerim.fr Subject: Re: 8-byte register values on a 32-bit machine Cc: brobecker@gnat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Okay, I got some sleep and drank some tea and stuff. I'm a bit more calm now. :) I filed a proper PR, so that Daniel J (or anybody) can flow it into their TODO list. Daniel said he has several things to do in this code so I want to get in line properly. I did mark it severity=critical because gdb prints incorrect values, and priority=high because Stephane C says that it happens a lot on the HC11. gdb 5.3 has a different bug in the same area, so this is only sort-of a regression. The specific program store.exp in the test suite regressed between 2003-02-15 and 2003-02-23, but my test program r8.c in the PR is busted with both gdb 5.3 and gdb 2003-03-01-cvs. Michael C