From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12901-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 1454 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2003 20:50:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 1445 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 20:50:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 20:50:27 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h23KoP830562;
	Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:50:25 -0600
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 20:50:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200303032050.h23KoP830562@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com
Subject: Re: DejaGNU vs snapshots [drow@mvista.com: Re: [5.3] What's the hold up?]
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2

Hi Daniel,

> Try "automake --foreign" in the example/calc/ directory.  The version
> of automake that I have installed generates a makefile which removes
> config.status properly.  So does the snapshot from sourceware. 
> Regenerating it is all it takes.

That sounds like it will fix my problem.

> I don't think a "big" cleanup is called for.

I do.  dejagnu currently has a custom *TCL* script to help with the
cleanup.  There's gotta be some good cleanup opportunities in there.

I don't think gdb needs that cleanup to happen, though.  It would
just be for dejagnu's benefit.

Michael C