* status report on gdb testing
@ 2003-03-10 17:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-03-10 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
I've been quiet for a few days so I just wanted to stick my head up.
I did a full test run and I'm crunching the results now for gdb 5.3.
gcc has 3 different regressions! Well, that's why I do test runs where
the only variable is gcc. One of the regressions is a compile-time
error (missing include file) so that's definitely a gcc bug. The other
two are regressions in gdb test output so I may need some help
analyzing whether they are gcc's fault or gdb's fault.
I haven't even looked at the gdb HEAD results yet.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-03-10 17:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-10 17:09 status report on gdb testing Michael Elizabeth Chastain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).