From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-13102-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2819 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2003 19:36:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2775 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2003 19:36:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2003 19:36:12 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18v2IP-0003O0-00; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:37:26 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18v0Ox-0002wW-00; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:36:03 -0500
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:36:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Joerg Beyer <j.beyer@web.de>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: removes trivial compilation warning
Message-ID: <20030317193603.GB11288@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Beyer <j.beyer@web.de>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <200303171919.h2HJJc310659@mailgate5.cinetic.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200303171919.h2HJJc310659@mailgate5.cinetic.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2

On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:19:38PM +0100, Joerg Beyer wrote:
> This fixes a trivial warning:
> 
> gdb/gdbserver/gdbreplay.c gives a warning, because atoi is
> not declared. The inlcude of stdlib.h fixes this:
> 
>     Joerg
> 
> diff -c src_orig/gdb/gdbserver/gdbreplay.c src/gdb/gdbserver/gdbreplay.c
> *** src_orig/gdb/gdbserver/gdbreplay.c  2002-07-09 19:38:58.000000000 +0200
> --- src/gdb/gdbserver/gdbreplay.c       2003-03-17 19:53:38.000000000 +0100
> ***************
> *** 30,35 ****
> --- 30,36 ----
>   #include <ctype.h>
>   #include <fcntl.h>
>   #include <errno.h>
> + #include <stdlib.h>
> 
>   #ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H
>   #include <stdlib.h> 

Look down a line in your patch.  Is HAVE_STDLIB_H not getting defined?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer