public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* bogged down in sunday testing
@ 2003-03-24  5:22 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
  2003-03-24 15:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-03-24  5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb

Okay, I capitulate.  My last Sunday report was 2003-02-28.  I am
bogged down and I could use a little help from my friends.

The problem is that I have multiple systemic failures with gcc HEAD.
I've reported one of them as pr gcc/10055, but there are several more.

I'm thinking of just dropping coverage of gcc HEAD for a while so that
I can make reports oriented towards getting gdb 5.4/6.0 released.
I don't think that 'works with gcc HEAD' is a release criterion.

I can drop coverage, treat the gcc HEAD bugs as a separate task,
and get back in gear, like testing that java regression
fix from David Carlton.

Does that sound reasonable?

Michael C

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: bogged down in sunday testing
  2003-03-24  5:22 bogged down in sunday testing Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2003-03-24 15:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-03-24 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: gdb

On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 11:21:59PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Okay, I capitulate.  My last Sunday report was 2003-02-28.  I am
> bogged down and I could use a little help from my friends.
> 
> The problem is that I have multiple systemic failures with gcc HEAD.
> I've reported one of them as pr gcc/10055, but there are several more.
> 
> I'm thinking of just dropping coverage of gcc HEAD for a while so that
> I can make reports oriented towards getting gdb 5.4/6.0 released.
> I don't think that 'works with gcc HEAD' is a release criterion.
> 
> I can drop coverage, treat the gcc HEAD bugs as a separate task,
> and get back in gear, like testing that java regression
> fix from David Carlton.
> 
> Does that sound reasonable?

Yeah.  I'd like to focus on GCC HEAD at some point but we should wait
until after the release of GCC 3.3 to do it probably.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-24 15:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-24  5:22 bogged down in sunday testing Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-24 15:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).