From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Kris Warkentin <kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: long long considered harmful?
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030423211716.GA25678@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <096e01c3099d$ba1f3a30$0202040a@catdog>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:39:13AM -0400, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> > > Pardon me, by overall structure, I mean the starting address of the
> > > structure. Having a 64 bit entry causes the compiler to align the
> structure
> > > on a 64 bit boundary.
> >
> > Whoever told you this is mistaken. A long long member of a structure
> > only has four byte alignment on i386-linux, for example. That's
> > mandated by the psABI.
> >
> > This is exactly one of those reasons why you can not use structures
> > on the host to describe data on the target.
>
> I'm not talking about host vs. target here. These are the structures used
> by our Mips and PowerPC kernels. I believe the mips compiler will do the
> alignment as mentioned above. You are correct that you can't rely on it
> being the same on host and target but this is not something that matters in
> this case. All that's important is that when the data comes over the wire,
> we can get at it. In this case, because of the awkward define (data below
If you want to get at it, then it _is_ a host vs. target issue.
> is unsigned regs[74]), we wind up extracting the mips registers like so:
>
> static void regset_fetch( int endian, unsigned first, unsigned last,
> unsigned *data )
> {
> if( endian) data += 1; /* data in second word for big endian */
> for(; first <= last; ++first) {
> supply_register(first, (char *)data);
> data+=2;
> }
> }
>
> I know it's not 100% portable. I personally don't really care as long as it
> works on the hosts that we support. The only reason I'm asking all this is
> because I want to know what level of portability is required for the GDB
> project to accept this patch. I was trying to eliminate the long longs in a
> relatively painless way and the char array seems to be not too bad. Are you
> really trying to tell me that gdb wouldn't blow up on a 32 bit char host as
> it stands right now? If you really feel that the only way for me to make
> this acceptable is to just use a blob of memory and a table of offsets into
> it, then that's what I'll do. My mandate is to get our stuff accepted so I
> don't really have a choice. (I'd really rather not though. ;-)
If it's not portable, I'd really strongly prefer it not go in at all
until it is. I went through this exact thing making core dumps work in
a cross environment; someone wanted to use them from a 64-bit Solaris
host.
It's just as easy to do it right, really. Look at this:
typedef char qnx_reg64[8];
static void regset_fetch (int endian, unsigned first, unsigned last, qnx_reg64 *data)
{
for (; first <= last; first++)
{
if (endian)
supply_register (first, (char *) &data[0][4]);
else
supply_register (first, (char *) data);
data++;
}
}
Was that really so hard? And it's a lot clearer.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-23 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-22 17:39 Kris Warkentin
2003-04-22 17:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-22 18:08 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-22 18:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-22 18:41 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-22 19:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-22 19:12 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-22 19:25 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-22 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-23 13:39 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-23 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-04-23 21:23 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-23 21:44 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-23 21:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-23 22:09 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-23 22:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-23 22:17 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-04-24 21:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-24 23:51 ` Kris Warkentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030423211716.GA25678@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).