From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29133 invoked by alias); 3 May 2003 18:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29124 invoked from network); 3 May 2003 18:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2003 18:05:45 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 9B4B1D34B8; Sat, 3 May 2003 11:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 18:05:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Don Bowman Cc: 'Andrew Cagney ' , "'gdb@sources.redhat.com '" Subject: Re: Delete remote VxWorks RDB support? Message-ID: <20030503180540.GU992@gnat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 > I suspect most people using vxworks are also using the windriver-supplied > versions of gdb/gcc, which are (as of a couple of years ago), using WDB. Actually, WRS' supplyed version of GDB uses WTX now. The communication over WDB is handled by the target server. -- Joel