public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: "Harris, Jeff" <JeffH@aiinet.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdbserver cross compile
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 21:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030505213516.GA4449@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B785392832ED71192AE00D0B7B0D75B1C647C@aimail.aiinet.com>

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 05:29:48PM -0400, Harris, Jeff wrote:
> I was having problems with getting gdbserver to correctly detect whether it
> is being built with a cross-compiler or not.  I was trying to cross-compile
> from i386 (RedHat 7.2) to i386(gcc 3.2.3 and glibc 2.3.2).  The configure
> script for gdbserver looks to have been created with an old version of
> autoconf (2.13 I believe).  The mechanism it uses to detect a cross compiler
> simply tries to compile a simple program and run it.  If it runs, it decides
> it isn't cross-compiling otherwise it is cross-compiling.  
> 
> My problem was that while this program runs with the cross-compiler, the
> program to detect whether standard C headers are used does not run.  As a
> result, the STDC_HEADERS #define is not set and ultimately a compile error
> to occur.
> 
> There doesn't seem to be a way to override the configure script's detection
> mechanism.  However, if I rerun autoconf (version 2.53) in the gdbserver
> directory, the resulting configure script is updated to include better
> logic.  Basically, it compares the build and host options to configure to
> determine its cross-compile state.  This mechanism works for me since I have
> different values for these options.
> 
> Is an updated version of configure something that would be considered for
> GDB 5.4?  

Sadly, no.  You can't use autoconf 2.5x with the current source tree,
in general; the conversion process is still being talked about.

It's pretty easy to fake out the 2.13 logic for this case.  I don't
remember exactly what the magic was, since I can't find any specific
reference to it in our cross build scripts; but all you should need to
do is preload one of the configure script's cache variables with
something that says no, don't run programs.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-05 21:30 Harris, Jeff
2003-05-05 21:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-05-05 21:47 Harris, Jeff
2003-05-05 21:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-05 22:06 Harris, Jeff
2015-05-20 16:36 GdbServer " Uladzimir Kryvian
2015-05-20 16:51 ` Stan Shebs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030505213516.GA4449@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=JeffH@aiinet.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).