From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10152 invoked by alias); 6 May 2003 14:59:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10142 invoked from network); 6 May 2003 14:59:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 May 2003 14:59:54 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19D3vO-0005wn-00; Tue, 06 May 2003 10:00:10 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19D3uy-00075s-00; Tue, 06 May 2003 10:59:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 14:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alain Magloire Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Catchpoint in GDB/MI Message-ID: <20030506145944.GA27250@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alain Magloire , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200305061450.KAA00262@node1.ott.qnx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305061450.KAA00262@node1.ott.qnx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 10:50:47AM -0400, Alain Magloire wrote: > Bonjour > > Anyone working on putting catchpoints in GDB/MI. > If yes what is the semantics. > If no what is the best semantic? Completely OOB: > > -catch load > ^done > ... > > *stop,reason="shared-loaded",shared="libm.so" Do we even have any targets besides HP/UX where shared library catchpoints _work_? We need to fix them before we talk about their MI syntax, IMO. Similarly for most of the others. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer