public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: pkoning@equallogic.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: watchpoint troubles
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 18:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030507183329.88D0B7885A@deneb.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16057.18767.270168.635955@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com> (message from Paul Koning on Wed, 7 May 2003 13:58:39 -0400)

>>>>> Paul Koning writes:

> I'm having all sorts of watchpoint troubles with gdb 5.3 and a remote
> target.   These are things I'm running into as I'm working to improve
> the implementation of watchpoints in my remote stub.

...

> Without that flag, the first thing that gdb does after the watchpoint
> entry is to read the address being watched.  Needless to say, that
> causes a watchpoint recursion within the target stub.  In the case
> where HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT is defined, things work because the
> watchpoint is removed before the memory read request is made.

> Since gdb normally removes and reinserts watch/break points on every
> entry, I figured it's gdb's job to do things in the right order.  Bad
> assumption?  I can certainly hack up the stub to remove the
> watchpoints before acting on any memory access requests from gdb, but
> is that kind of hackery supposed to be done?

This has come up before:

  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-03/msg00506.html

I think the answer is that the stub should disable watchpoints
anytime the target stops and reenable them when stepping or
continuing.

--Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-07 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-07 17:59 Paul Koning
2003-05-07 18:33 ` Mark Salter [this message]
2003-05-07 18:53   ` Paul Koning
2003-05-07 19:38     ` Paul Koning
2003-05-07 21:45     ` Paul Koning

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030507183329.88D0B7885A@deneb.localdomain \
    --to=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=pkoning@equallogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).