From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14902 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 20:32:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14859 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 20:32:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.163.213.212) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 20:32:16 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFDC354C; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h49KWE327031; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:32:14 -0700 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 20:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200305092032.h49KWE327031@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb/dwarf-frame.c In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz's message of Friday, 9 May 2003 09:41:36 -0400 <20030509134135.GA20959@nevyn.them.org> Emacs: freely redistributable; void where prohibited by law. X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 > My understanding from Mark's earlier post is that it is an intentional > but probably temporary omission - since dwarf-frame is only a week or > two old at this point. I want it all and I want it now, dammit! No, wait, wrong attitude module. That's what I was hoping to hear. Perhaps I can lend a hand to speed up the process of implementing the rest of it. > Should any work even be necessary? My understanding was that the > kernel code would show up in the shared library list. Oh, I guess it > is - we usually locate .eh_frame via BFD, which means section headers > and an on-disk file. I see. Indeedy. Thanks, Roland