From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1888 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 22:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1815 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 22:33:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.163.213.212) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 22:33:27 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC70354C; Fri, 9 May 2003 15:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h49MXP727620; Fri, 9 May 2003 15:33:25 -0700 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 22:33:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200305092233.h49MXP727620@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Mark Kettenis , ezannoni@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb/dwarf-frame.c In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney's message of Friday, 9 May 2003 18:28:23 -0400 <3EBC2B87.6050209@redhat.com> X-Zippy-Says: I invented skydiving in 1989! X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 > There is apparently a story here. I'm told that some people were > arguing that GDB would need a complete rewrite if it were to ever > support NPTL. Turned out to effectively be the oposite. If you mean that the Linux kernel's ptrace implementation needed to be majorly overhauled to support its new kernel threads implementation even a little bit sensically, tnen yes.