From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-13822-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4210 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 19:29:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28948 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 19:28:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO white) (68.14.146.65)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 19:28:37 -0000
Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19FIyQ-0004pT-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 15:28:34 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 19:29:00 -0000
From: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi@cox.net>
To: Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 6
Message-ID: <20030512192834.GA18114@white>
Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>,
	Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <16061.32163.69181.411133@nick.uklinux.net> <3EBE69AE.30001@redhat.com> <20030511201320.0C21675FDD@nick.uklinux.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030511201320.0C21675FDD@nick.uklinux.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2

On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 09:13:20PM +0100, Nick Roberts wrote:
> 
>  > > Here is a revised and reduced list of annotations that I think I could
>  > > work with:
>  > > 
>  > > frames-invalid
>  > > breakpoints-invalid
>  > > pre-prompt
>  > > prompt
>  > > commands
>  > > overload-choice
>  > > query
>  > > prompt-for-continue
>  > > post-prompt
>  > > source
>  > > starting
>  > > exited
>  > > signalled
>  > > signal
>  > > breakpoint
>  > > watchpoint
>  > > frame-begin
>  > > stopped
>  > 
>  > I'm not sure about frame begin.  Things like frames-invalid are events 
>  > and they can stay (forever? ...).
>  > 
> 
> I don't really need frame-begin. The problem that I have, however, is that
> frame-begin (and other annotations) are issued *before* stopped. This meant
> that sometimes Emacs thought that frame details output by Gdb were output by
> the inferior and so they were displayed in the IO buffer. I can only reproduce
> this problem now with tbreak where a typical annotation sequence (avoiding
> many repeats) looks like:

Is it possible for you to use the tty command?
This is what I do with cgdb.
That way you always know if the output is from the inferior or from gdb.

Bob Rossi