From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-13830-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2930 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 21:23:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2671 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 21:23:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 21:23:13 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19FKla-0004tg-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 16:23:26 -0500
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19FKl7-0001xQ-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 17:22:57 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 21:23:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>,
	"J. Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>,
	Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: NPTL thread support
Message-ID: <20030512212257.GA6664@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>,
	Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>,
	"J. Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>,
	Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <20030509075610.B1675@lucon.org> <16059.52718.465177.555337@localhost.redhat.com> <20030509091522.A2960@lucon.org> <16059.55278.841645.134311@localhost.redhat.com> <20030511134556.A22269@lucon.org> <3EBFF3ED.8050807@redhat.com> <20030512130839.A9491@lucon.org> <ro1smrjzztz.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <3EC00D8C.1040100@redhat.com> <ro1k7cvzwwp.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ro1k7cvzwwp.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 02:18:30PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2003 17:09:32 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:
> 
> >> These are all normal.  (I can't speak about the gdb.objc ones.)
> 
> > Unless you've got ObjC installed, those are normal as well (it
> > should probably be tweaked too, like threads, just fail when the
> > compiler dies).
> 
> Whoops, you're right: I thought I was seeing different messages, but I
> was seeing those FAILs as well.  I agree that the current failure mode
> for gdb.objc is suboptimal.  Though calling gdb_suppress_entire_file
> sounds reasonable to me; is there no way to fix it to actually end the
> file instead of trying and failing to suppress the tests in the file?

Just say "return 0"?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer